She has worked extensively in critical care, both as a staff nurse and a nurse manager. Currently, she teaches and does clinical research related to end-of-life issues. Organ donation occurs as a culmination of 2 processes: Donation cannot occur outside these contexts, and thus understanding end-of-life issues and having a commitment to a caring request process are essential.
The following answers to this central philosophical question each win a random book. The closest to perfection would be an interdependent Confederation of societies, each containing between one and two hundred citizens, depending upon factors such as location and climate.
These villages would be more or less evenly distributed across the globe, having access to roughly equivalent amounts of arable land. Thirty per cent of all land would be designated wilderness, and no societies would be allowed to colonise these areas, but antisocial individuals would be free to inhabit the wilderness following a life-style of total lonesomeness.
Each society would be run according to a consensus of members, on a Rousseauian model of full participation of all members over 14 and council decree. Dissenting members will be invited to move to alternative societies, set up their own on land proportionate to the size of the dissenting group, or to take to the wilderness.
Councils may legislate on shared interests, but there will be no laws restricting private activities provided these do not infringe upon the same freedoms of others. Whilst each society would decide its own rules, the Confederation would respect a universal constitution according to which no-one can own anything they have not made.
Communal products could be exchanged freely amongst individuals or between societies. There would be no money, and no hoarding of mutually-owned resources, on pain of banishment to the wilderness. Every year there would be a Global Festival of Gratitude and Giving, during which gifts would be freely exchanged and art, music, dances and games would celebrate and renew the freedom of the Earth from human domination.
According to the constitution, animals culled from the wild may be eaten during the winter in cold climates and during illness. But there would be no domestication or other infringement upon the freedom of animals.
Killing would be allowed only if human life is in danger, or to stabilize populations and environmental harmony. All waste would be recycled, and energy derived only from renewable sources such as wind and tide. If one society threatens aggression against another, the Global Confederation would boycott it for 50 years.
Members would be invited to join alternative societies, but may emigrate only to one that has received no other members of the rogue society.
All political relationships will be entirely internal to each society and there would be no alliances formed between societies. Societies attempting to form political allegiances or extend their power beyond their own members will be boycotted. Individuals would be free to travel to and form relationships with individuals of other societies, but any group growing too large for its arable resources would have to redistribute.
Helen Williams, Coley Sirgar, Swansea The perfect society would be one in which everybody got whatever they wanted. Obviously, this is impossible to achieve. So we can only strive for the best possible society. This logically would be the one in which everyone got as much of what they want as it is possible to equitably achieve.
Achieving this would be the equivalent of finding the lines of best fit through a series of points for various graphs.
For example, if we all have different opinions about the ideal length of a working day, then in the best society the length of the working day would be the mean of all our ideals.
Generally, in the best possible society, all parameters would be set at the average of our individual ideals about that thing. Clearly, there are some huge practical difficulties to achieving this society — so huge as to render the full achievement of it an impossibility.
Nevertheless, it is an ideal we can work towards. Indeed, it would seem that society is slowly moving in this direction.
The biggest step we have taken in many countries towards this society of the average is the democratic election of leaders — and as our administrations become more transparent and accountable, populations are able to exert greater pressure on their governments to act more in line with the collective will.
We can imagine in the not too distant future being able to register our views online and by phone; and thus we will be able to easily and rapidly vote on many more issues than we do currently.
Just as we now vote on X-Factor, we might soon be voting on important political issues: So the best society would involve a whole lot more reality TV. Mostly, government is about manipulating political and economic power.
It does not produce a good society. These disputes will be limited to the basics:What would make the best society?
An aggregate of people living together in a harmonious community with common values and customs. But although this appears an acceptable definition, harmony is a difficult if not impossible state to achieve in society, and the maintenance of harmony invariably impedes the achievement of individual ideals.
individuals exist independently of society and can be understood without considering social influence. c. sociology is only interested in the way people act, not in the way they think. d. neither society nor the individual exists in . End-of-Life Decision Making, Organ Donation, and Critical Care Nurses Barbara J.
Daly, RN, PhD Barbara J. Daly is an associate professor at Case Western Reserve University and the director of a clinical ethics program at University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio. Law is important for a society for it serves as a norm of conduct for men if these would break through the law that was being passed is ineffective.
It . The perfect society would be one in which everybody got whatever they wanted.
Obviously, this is impossible to achieve. Obviously, this is impossible to achieve. So we can only strive for the best possible society.
Salaries of police officers are based on many factors, including experience, skills and training. However, one of the most important factors is based on geography. Certain areas of the country pay more, but are often in areas that have higher costs of living.
Police officers are a vital component to maintaining a peaceful society. While.