Major Differences Reading The response demonstrates effective comprehension of the source text.
Darkness is essential to humans.
Here, Bogard talks about the importance of darkness to humans. Humans need darkness to sleep in order to be healthy.
Animals also need darkness. Ecological light pollution is like the bulldozer of the night, wrecking habitat and disrupting ecosystems several billion years in the making. Here Bogard explains that animals, too, need darkness to survive.
Overall, this response demonstrates partially successful reading comprehension. The response demonstrates no understanding of the analytical task. Instead, the writer merely cites two sentences from the passage, and offers a brief restatement of each point.
Overall, this paper demonstrates inadequate analysis. This essay demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill in the use and control of language. Overall, this essay does not provide enough evidence of writing ability to warrant a score higher than a 1. His essay talks about so much facts about sleeping how so little can effect us health wise examples like getting sleep disorders, diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression.
This facts helps people persuade the audience he also say that the world health organization classifies working night shift is bad. In his argument is not all about how it bad for the body he also claims and have proof that light cost are expensive and really costing people because they have light all night long.
He also claims light is messing with mother nature that animals need darkness to feed eat move around because there noctuaral creatures. He has details facts about human body, animals and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much light at night and how we need darkness.
With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us.
He was all of facts and examples that he claim is efficting us and there world. On the whole, this essay displays only a partial understanding of the source text.
This facts helps people persuade the audience. Other than identifying these as persuasive facts, however, the writer does nothing to indicate an understanding of the analytical task.
The writer again mentions persuasion before the conclusion of the essay With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for usbut once again, there is no explanation of how or why these features are persuasive. This response demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill in the use and control of language.
The response also lacks a recognizable introduction and conclusion, and sentences are strung together without a clear progression of ideas for much of the response, the writer merely lists claims Bogard makes.
The response also lacks variety in sentence structures, in part because of repetitive transitions. For example, he also claims is used two sentences in a row in this brief response.
Weak control of the conventions of standard written English, coupled with vague word choice, undermine the quality of writing.Wilhelm Reich (/ r aɪ x /; German: ; 24 March – 3 November ) was an Austrian doctor of medicine and psychoanalyst, a member of the second generation of analysts after Sigmund Freud.
The author of several influential books, most notably Character Analysis (), The Mass Psychology of Fascism (), and The Sexual Revolution (), Reich became known as one of the most radical. Free textual analysis papers, essays, and research papers.
The SAT essay graders love it! Your introduction should describe the text and paraphrase the argument being made, as well as introduce the specific elements of the passage and argument that you will discuss in the essay. The number of colleges that require applicants to complete the timed-essay portion of college admission tests is dwindling.
On Friday, Yale University said applicants will no longer be required to. INTRODUCTION. In , when the author of the essays here assembled was elected professor of political and social science in Yale College, he was, to use his own words, “a young and untried man.” He was selected for his position, not as a specialist, but because he was what he was.
Someone in those days must have been an excellent judge of men. Further to our last post on the SAT essay, below I’ve posted a full version of the essay I started in our video with 3 Tips to Improve Your SAT Essay Score (I made a few adjustments– I hadn’t finished writing it when I posted the first two paragraphs 🙂).