The effects of genetic engineering on

A basic technique used is the genetic engineering of bacteria. It can be broken into the following key stages: Identifying the gene from amongst all the others in the DNA of the donor organism.

The effects of genetic engineering on

Farm Wars There is a move afoot to reprogram humanity. To redefine it in the limited terms of scientific understanding, place it in a box, and then, all wrapped up in a pretty package, attempt to deliver this convoluted mess to us as progress.

There are those who think that, given the chance, they could and should genetically manipulate the earth and the creatures that inhabit it, including man, to suite a purpose of their own imaginings.

And if this means combining cows and humans, goats and spiders, man and machine in order to achieve the goal? Well, so be it. After all, the only thing that is important is the end result.

And the end result is that a few will obtain immortality… or so they think. And if a few eggs get broken in the process, well, that is the price paid for success.

CRISPR: A game-changing genetic engineering technique - Science in the News

This is Transhumanism — the natural culmination of something called reprogenetics. Some call it designer evolution.

The effects of genetic engineering on

In short, reprogenetics is the genetic engineering of man to create a human race according to scientific design. Here is a definition from Lee M. Among these are improvements in interpreting the effects of different expressions of DNAthe ability to harvest large numbers of embryos from females, and a far higher rate of reinsertion of embryos into host mothers.

The end result, according to Silver, is that those parents who can afford it will be able to pick out the genetic characteristics of their own children, which Silver says will trigger a number of social changes in the decades after its implementation.

Possible early applications, however, might be closer to eliminating disease genes passed on to children. According to Silver, the main differences between reprogenetics and eugenicsthe belief in the possibility of improving the gene pool which in the first half of the 20th century became infamous for the brutal policies it inspired, is that most eugenics programs were compulsory programs imposed upon citizens by governments trying to enact an ultimate goal.

It becomes quite apparent, after reading the quote above, that the main difference between reprogenetics and eugenics is consent, according to Lee M. Reprogenetics — consented to.

Same thing, different mode of action. From the forced culling of those deemed inferior to creating a superior race through genetic engineering, the end result is the same.

Those deemed inferior are eventually culled from the system using DNA manipulation techniques. Eugenics — renamed and defined as scientific progress.

A life-saving technique that can reprogram the human race and create the ideal human family. We know what we are doing. Genome Compiler is built on the idea that biology is information technology. We can design and program living things the same way that we design computer code.

Genetically engineered foods: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia

Genetic designers today are still writing in 1s and 0s — they lack the missing tools to design, debug, and compile the biological code into new living things. We are inspired by the breakthrough research done by the JCVI and Harvard with their achievement of whole bacterial genome engineering, as required for functional changes in the form of new codes, new amino acids, safety and virus-resistance — and a vision of making biological design easier, cheaper, and open to people outside the research labs.

That is what we are supposed to believe. And who is to say what is human and what is not? The Transhumanist Agenda The following quote pretty much sums up the Transhumanist attitude towards the relationship between you, me, the computer I am using to write this, and the chair I am sitting on: Whether somebody is implemented on silicon or biological tissue, if it does not affect functionality or consciousness, is of no moral significance.

Carbon-chauvinism, in the form of anthropomorphismspeciesism, bioism or even fundamentalist humanism, is objectionable on the same grounds as racism.In the course of development almost any gene can have pleiotropic effects, and not just on physiology, but on the architecture of organs, and the wiring of the nervous system, including the brain.

Transhumanism is not necessarily a bad thing, it is just a tool. It can be used for good or evil, like any tool. Unfortunately, most all transhumanists are materialists, so human beings, as well as animals, are not deserving of compassion, love, etc. Genetic Engineering [back to top] Genetic engineering, also known as recombinant DNA technology, means altering the genes in a living organism to produce a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) with a new genotype.

Various kinds of genetic modification are possible: inserting a foreign gene from one species into another, forming a transgenic organism; altering an existing gene so that its.

Updated November Introduction. Genetic engineering, or genetic modification, uses a variety of tools and techniques from biotechnology and bioengineering to modify an organism’s genetic makeup.

While genetic engineering can lead to introduction of greater quality traits in organisms, it can also have undesirable side effects. To understand the pros and cons of genetic engineering, read on. Human genetic engineering is a development that people are either very passionate about or opposed to completely.

This article gives a brief account on the effect of this principle on the biosphere together with several controversial issues that accompany the acceptance of this technology [ 3 ].

IB Biology Notes - Genetic engineering and biotechnology